Archive for April, 2007

The idiocy of bias

You’d think I’d be inured to political stupidity by now. It appears I am not.

In a wonderful piece of self-gratulation, Tariana Turia (Maori Party) blamed Christianity and colonisation for the introduction of smacking to the Maori people as a form of discipline.

I’m no fan of Sue Bradford’s bill, I freely admit. But neither am I a fan of someone who appears to be placing the blame for a problem in the here and now – child abuse in some Maori families[*] – on the actions of colonising Europeans over two hundred years ago!

Let’s backtrack.

First, Sue Bradford’s intention was to make the use of violence unacceptable against children. A goal I applaud. She’s chosen to do it by attempting to repeal section 59 of the Crimes Act, which allows reasonable force as a defense when under charges of ‘over-disciplining’ your children. Unfortunately, politics has got in the way, and we’re left with a big ugly mess, given incredibly bad press, very little public support, and very little public understanding.

Second, it’s true that statistically speaking, Maori families have higher reported rates of family violence. I agree that that’s a situation which needs change. I agree that the colonisation of New Zealand changed the Maori people irrevocably. It introduced the concept of Christianity. Shall we examine some Christian principles?

The Bible says that children should be disciplined. We all know “Spare the rod, spoil the child”. But child abuse was never, never, what Christianity preached. I’m not even Christian, and I have better understanding than that! Jesus himself loved children. He taught peace, taught respect for one’s fellow man. Taught that a husband and wife should love and respect each other, and in turn teach and care for their children in a loving way.

Shall we also look at historically provable things the Maori, as a people, did prior to European colonisation of them?

  • Wiped out the Moriori (historically debatable, I admit)
  • Had bloody wars between tribes
  • Drove the moa into extinction

Hardly the record of a peaceful people whose whanau were only corrupted by the heinous introduction of the European settlers.

Further, has it escaped Tariana Turia’s notice that many European families, both now and in the past, also had parents who were perfectly capable of disciplining their children without physical violence?

Think about how society has changed, too. Remember the time where it took a village to bring up a child? Where parents had support from the surrounding community, were near their parents, their siblings, in constant communication with their friends and families, had support networks to rely on? How many parents today bring up their children as best they can, with parents and families many miles away, both having to work each day, without their whanau surrounding them?

So, here’s my advice, Tariana. Think about what you can do to support the people you represent, here and now. Instead of trying to foist away the blame for today on people two hundred years ago, look for ways to make it better tomorrow.

Of course, my voice means nothing. I’m only one of the bloody Pakeha who corrupted your people. Shall I make sure the door doesn’t slap me on the arse on the way out?

(* I specify Maori abuse as Tariana Turia is representative of the Maori party. I am thoroughly aware that Europeans and other racial groups are represented in the statistics about child abuse. Thanks.)

When analysis is bad

It’s extraordinarily satisfying knowing you have all day, and nothing to do but read a good book.

It’s even better if you’re paid for the privilege. Weekend shifts at work are notoriously quiet, and today was no exception – a password reset, a query regarding printing, and instructions on unlocking a computer (Ctrl-Alt-Del, put in your password, away we go).

I’ve read since I was very, very small. Being so sick as a child, Mum taught me to read early, to occupy me when I wasn’t well enough to run around like the other brats. This was fine, and up to the age of fourteen or so I read voraciously – anything and everything I could get my hands on. Trash and treasure lived happily on my bookshelves, and the librarians knew me by sight (the little kid in glasses who takes out 40 books a time).

By age fourteen, I’d found the genres that engage me. Science fiction, fantasy, worlds almost our own; different enough to hold my interest. The world I live in surrounds me every day, I don’t need to exercise any imagination to get there. Reading is escapism for me – a chance to leave life for awhile, to join some other world, experience something that’ll never happen in my little mundane world of computers and buses and 40-hour-work-weeks.

The problem is, I’ve read a lot. And there’s only so many things you can read before the ideas become jaded, and the pleasure comes mainly from the author’s expression. For me, Terry Pratchett is never old, because I appreciate the humour, the sly digs at our politics or world situation – it’s not what he writes, it’s how he writes it. The Science of Discworld series are some of the most engaging non-fiction explanations of how our world works I’ve ever read, and I enjoy science.

The problem is, I developed some critical ability. English classes taught me to analyse my books. Age made me less credulous.

Perhaps it’s because I was at work today, and thus more analytical than my relaxed self at home. I expect to counter problems at work, I expect to need to analyse them for their real answers. So, I read my book happily, and largely undisturbed for three hours. And it was a good book – inventive, interesting, character depth. The third in a trilogy. But I couldn’t help, whilst reading, analysing what lay beneath. The Merlin archetype. The cliched dragon. The religion that owes more than a little influence to Buddhism.

I love books, and I love reading. I just wish I could recapture the naivete of my fourteen year old self, reading Tolkien under the covers by torchlight, totally and utterly engrossed.

In sickness and in ..

I have had another lung infection, the last week or so. Fortunately, I was rostered off Thursday/Friday. I was forced to take off the previous Wednesday, due to excessive coughing.

I went into my Saturday night shift, though, knowing I’d be working alone (and thus not sharing germs). I was met by my colleague who’d done the previous shift thusly:
“Hi Mahal, how’re you recovering? Because no offense, you still look like shit.”
“I only came in because no-one would be here to breathe on. So, um, once you fuck off home?”
“Ah. Yes. Excellent point. Bye!”

Monday and Tuesday, with my nose running like a tap and an insufficient voice quantity to answer phones, I also called off sick. Well, to be accurate, I texted off sick.

Later in the day, my work cellphone rang. Tobermory grabbed it.
“Mahal’s answering service, how can I help?”
My boss does have a good sense of humour, and by Tobe’s account was giggling post-phonecall.

He also texted in the evening, asking me to swap shifts later this week, so that I’m working Sunday. Given what a good workplace it is, and how wonderfully accommodating Bossman is, and given my desire to remain in the Good Books, I happily obliged.

Mum is sick. Currently trying to expel a kidney stone. I am not happy about this, and in some ways I’d like to be with her. Nothing I can do though, whether I’m here or there, so she ordered me to stay here and go about my business. Poor Mum.

Tobermory isn’t a well man, still, but he’s coping. And the work situation is looking up. I’m afraid to mention the details, for fear I’ll jinx it. Suffice to say that two of the jobs in the pipeline would answer our needs and fulfill several shiny wishes very happily.

I’m crossing my fingers.

Oh hi, we've stolen your cat

This is Candy. She seems to have moved in here, despite desperate efforts to prevent this.

Said efforts include:

  • buying catfood
  • putting a fluffy blanket in one of our chairs
  • letting her sleep on the bed
  • playing with her with tennis balls and catnip mice

Miss Candy is a lovely girl. When she first insinuated herself into our place, she seemed absolutely desperate for attention, for stroking and cuddles. If you got up to use the bathroom, she’d wait by the door and mow plaintively at you. If you went into the bedroom, she’d attach herself magnet-style to your ankles.

Two or three weeks of cuddles and love, she’s settled down a lot. I think she’s gone home perhaps twice in that time? I know she’s inside here all night. And she rarely departs during the day.

I have guilt, because she’s such a lovely girl, the neighbours MUST be missing her, surely? Having said that, they haven’t made any efforts to retrieve her.

So, at some point of today, I have to wander over to the neighbours’ place. And politely explain to them that, I’m sorry, but had you noticed that your cat seems to have disappeared the last fortnight or so? Well, she’s moved in with us. Yes, I’m sorry, but she does seem happy here. She’s fed, and snuggled, and sleeps on the bed, and has a chair with her blanket on it, and um … well, can we keep her?

Update: Boo. I spoke to the neighbour (who incidentally was a very nice man) and it turns out they’re house sitting while the owners have been overseas for some months. They return at the end of April.

WOE.

Why I am a racist

I decided today that I’m a racist. Not in the typical sense.

For those who don’t know, New Zealand has two main racial groups. The native people (the Maori) and everyone else, imported some centuries later. New Zealand was colonised by Europeans – I shouldn’t need to elaborate on the atrocities that were committed to the Maori people, it’s a story that played out all over the globe as the world empires of the day overran the native people who happened to reside on the land they wanted.

Nor do I deny that, as a nation, they deserve at the very least recognition for those crimes. And some form of recompense.

So why do I say I’m a racist?

I was reading the newspaper today. (Online, natch.) And I tripped over a link that made me angry. Furiously, coldly, white-hot, angry. And I note, I have Maori friends. I have friends from most areas of the colour spectrum – not because I try, but because I pick my friends for their personalities, not their colours. However, Maori is the topic at hand, so. I’ve been on maraes, attended more powhiris than I can remember. A few tangis, too. Back in school, I had a pretty decent command of the language. Never had to use it since, so I’ve forgotten most of what I knew. I have no problems with any of the individual Maori I’ve ever known (barring the usual interpersonal disagreements also known as life). Half my relatives and cousins are Maori. I’ve spent a lot of time with their extended whanau. No problems there.

I have a hell of a lot of problems with some so-called Maori Policy, though; the policy that apparently represents the Maori people in the political arena.

I don’t argue that people of different ethnic origins often have different needs. For instance, the medical world. My genes predispose me to heart issues. Pacific Islanders have higher incidences of diabetes. If you’re Irish, you don’t tan. Asians tend to be of shorter stature than Europeans. Some racially-based policies are necessary, in any government of a multi-cultural society. Which, correct me if I’m wrong, is what New Zealand is supposed to be.

I was born in New Zealand. That grants me full citizenship here. Once I turned 18, I had the right to vote. The same legal rights as any other citizen of my country. So, why do I feel like I’m being relegated to the second class?

I went through school the only child of a widow. We were broke. And I was one of the lucky ones – when I went to uni, I managed to acquire a scholarship that was based purely on academic merit. I worked damned hard for my education. (And don’t get me started on the mess that is NCEA.) Simply by the trick of my birth, however, I was ineligible for well over half the available scholarships in my school year. Half of the ones I was eligible for were only due to my sex.

In the last few years, New Zealand has seen many, many legal battles over the Treaty of Waitangi. Again, I stress, I do not deny the claims to recompense that the Maori, as a people, have. They were foully treated by the European colonists. It’s the more extreme claims that get my goat. The seabed and foreshore claims, where the Maori people claimed exclusive rights over the seabed and foreshore areas of NZ. Remember where we’re an island nation, with a lot of business invested in fisheries, tourism, and similar water-related ventures? The commentary from a leading politician, who was thrilled that the Maori have such high rates of teen pregnancy, because that way they’re ‘browning up the nation’. The cases which are just starting to trickle into court, where the Maori claim control rights over our fresh water sources. The concept that Maori should have a special say in our immigration policies, because they’re the tangata whenua.

Why is my opinion somehow viewed as being worth less than that of a Kiwi of mixed Maori-and-other background (there is statistically no such thing as a pure-blooded Maori, as far as I’m aware)? I don’t care if your ancestors are brown, white, red, yellow, purple or green. Were you born here? Alternatively, do you have legal citizenship? Great! We’re equal then.

I was born in New Zealand. I have worked hard to get where I am, and will continue to do so. I pay my taxes, I don’t break the law, I’m a good citizen. In every census I’ve been old enough to legally complete myself, I’ve put my ethnicity as “New Zealander”. I was born here. I don’t want my inherited skin colour to make any difference to the way I’m treated by the Government that I help to elect.

It doesn’t work that way, of course.